PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-93.01%
Negative net income growth while SD stands at 73.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-5.25%
Negative yoy D&A while SD is 285.58%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-73.27%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-522.22%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SD at -2.06%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-190.97%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SD is 208.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-190.97%
Negative yoy usage while SD is 503.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-72.92%
Negative yoy while SD is 6038.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-62.50%
Negative yoy CFO while SD is 36.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-43.31%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -16.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-243.86%
Negative yoy acquisition while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
43.31%
Purchases growth of 43.31% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
105.31%
Liquidation growth of 105.31% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-68.17%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -391.06%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-273.43%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -18.23%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-8211.11%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.