PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.68%
Some net income increase while SD is negative at -37.93%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-15.45%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SD at -9.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
6.23%
Some yoy growth while SD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
366.67%
SBC growth well above SD's 86.61%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
1933.33%
Well above SD's 309.58% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1933.33%
Growth well above SD's 309.58%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-38.95%
Negative yoy while SD is 1104.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-38.17%
Negative yoy CFO while SD is 154.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-0.95%
Negative yoy CapEx while SD is 31.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-83.29%
Negative yoy acquisition while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-116.44%
Negative yoy purchasing while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
442.34%
Liquidation growth of 442.34% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
0.99%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SD's 586.12%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-354.10%
We reduce yoy invests while SD stands at 32.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-1508.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -183.67%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.