PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-188.64%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SD at -114.71%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.84%
Deferred tax of 11.84% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-15.09%
Negative yoy SBC while SD is 410.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-53.33%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SD is 178.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-342.86%
AR is negative yoy while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.33%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SD at -97.88%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-24.19%
Negative yoy while SD is 100.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
6.99%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SD's 143.27%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-72.20%
Negative yoy CapEx while SD is 14.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-99.23%
Negative yoy acquisition while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
1080.00%
Purchases growth of 1080.00% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
72.20%
Liquidation growth of 72.20% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-47.32%
We reduce yoy other investing while SD is 245.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-129.52%
We reduce yoy invests while SD stands at 29.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
98.87%
We repay more while SD is negative at -509.18%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-84.91%
Negative yoy issuance while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.