PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
165.94%
Some net income increase while SD is negative at -117.99%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
13.17%
Some D&A expansion while SD is negative at -76.38%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-98.43%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SD stands at 127.85%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-132.14%
Negative yoy SBC while SD is 406.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
87.10%
Less working capital growth vs. SD's 231.57%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
97.78%
AR growth while SD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-121.43%
Negative yoy usage while SD is 731.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-228.57%
Both negative yoy, with SD at -2262.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
3.25%
Some CFO growth while SD is negative at -8.61%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
0.20%
Lower CapEx growth vs. SD's 1.47%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-22.73%
Negative yoy acquisition while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
100.00%
Liquidation growth of 100.00% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
95.09%
We have some outflow growth while SD is negative at -51.99%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-2.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -0.09%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-4.76%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.