PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-55.65%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SD at -1267.07%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
2.44%
Some D&A expansion while SD is negative at -1.30%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-72.15%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
105.88%
SBC growth while SD is negative at -60.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-172.73%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SD is 1958.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
207.02%
AR growth of 207.02% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-172.73%
Negative yoy usage while SD is 1958.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
29.17%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SD's 385.66%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-16.56%
Negative yoy CFO while SD is 6.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
24.53%
CapEx growth well above SD's 23.40%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
1073.33%
Acquisition growth of 1073.33% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-373.33%
Negative yoy purchasing while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-373.33%
We reduce yoy other investing while SD is 17.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
29.31%
Investing outflow well above SD's 23.69%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
91.75%
We repay more while SD is negative at -15.86%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.56%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x SD's 23.41%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.