40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.60%
Negative net income growth while SD stands at 10.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
2.83%
Less D&A growth vs. SD's 198.98%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
51.72%
Deferred tax of 51.72% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
206.67%
SBC growth while SD is negative at -5.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-76.69%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SD is 111.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
303.27%
AR growth of 303.27% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-220.33%
Negative yoy AP while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-26.19%
Negative yoy usage while SD is 111.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-2933.33%
Both negative yoy, with SD at -91.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-28.42%
Negative yoy CFO while SD is 18.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7200.00%
Some acquisitions while SD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
750.00%
Growth well above SD's 109.92%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
48.64%
We have mild expansions while SD is negative at -153.23%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
52.31%
We repay more while SD is negative at -16.67%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-140.74%
We cut yoy buybacks while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.