40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-63.52%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SD at -77.42%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
30.00%
Some D&A expansion while SD is negative at -61.61%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
128.44%
Well above SD's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-129.41%
Negative yoy SBC while SD is 0.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
4540.00%
Well above SD's 139.65% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
694.58%
AR growth well above SD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-862.36%
Negative yoy inventory while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-232.88%
Negative yoy AP while SD is 269.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
4540.00%
Some yoy usage while SD is negative at -405.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
92.42%
Well above SD's 151.25%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
22.06%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of SD's 32.53%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-70.39%
Negative yoy CapEx while SD is 27.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
26.38%
Acquisition growth of 26.38% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-414.29%
We reduce yoy other investing while SD is 78.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-46.02%
We reduce yoy invests while SD stands at 27.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-7000.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SD is 46.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.13%
We cut yoy buybacks while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.