PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.59%
Some net income increase while SD is negative at -20.95%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
2.28%
Less D&A growth vs. SD's 258.40%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
75.62%
Deferred tax of 75.62% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-43.48%
Negative yoy SBC while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
99.39%
Slight usage while SD is negative at -123.90%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-63.37%
AR is negative yoy while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.65%
A yoy AP increase while SD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
77.17%
Some yoy usage while SD is negative at -123.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-102.14%
Negative yoy while SD is 31410.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
52.98%
Some CFO growth while SD is negative at -27.22%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-3.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -298.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
99.02%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. SD's 1302.63%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-365.49%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -4231.58%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
17.07%
We have mild expansions while SD is negative at -263.68%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
75.38%
Debt repayment above 1.5x SD's 8.70%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.40%
We have some buyback growth while SD is negative at -20.39%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.