PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
226.57%
Some net income increase while VTLE is negative at -2992.70%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-48.89%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with VTLE at -1.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
1240.68%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. VTLE's 13247.43%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.30%
Slight usage while VTLE is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-23.02%
Negative yoy while VTLE is 182.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
21.05%
Some CFO growth while VTLE is negative at -28.10%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
18.58%
CapEx growth of 18.58% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
-155.78%
Negative yoy acquisition while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
168.74%
Purchases growth of 168.74% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-162.53%
We reduce yoy sales while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-157.56%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -22.24%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
365.10%
We have mild expansions while VTLE is negative at -22.24%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
17.77%
Debt repayment growth of 17.77% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
227.31%
Issuance growth of 227.31% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-186831.83%
We cut yoy buybacks while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.