40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-34.85%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VTLE at -2992.70%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
10.84%
Some D&A expansion while VTLE is negative at -1.83%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
28.68%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. VTLE's 13247.43%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.11%
Slight usage while VTLE is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.11%
Growth of 95.11% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-66.94%
Negative yoy while VTLE is 182.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
2.36%
Some CFO growth while VTLE is negative at -28.10%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-39.96%
Negative yoy CapEx while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.36%
We have some outflow growth while VTLE is negative at -22.24%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-37.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -22.24%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-834.30%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-92.96%
Negative yoy issuance while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
68.61%
Buyback growth of 68.61% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.