40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-90.75%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VTLE at -2992.70%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-4.52%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with VTLE at -1.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
87.01%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. VTLE's 13247.43%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-378.76%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VTLE at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-378.76%
Negative yoy usage while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
149.23%
Well above VTLE's 182.14%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-18.13%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VTLE at -28.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
56.72%
CapEx growth of 56.72% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
352.24%
We have some outflow growth while VTLE is negative at -22.24%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
64.67%
We have mild expansions while VTLE is negative at -22.24%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
252.73%
Issuance growth of 252.73% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-16320.89%
We cut yoy buybacks while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.