PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-107.38%
Negative net income growth while VTLE stands at 110.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.99%
Less D&A growth vs. VTLE's 56.16%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-125.89%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.96%
Negative yoy working capital usage while VTLE is 158.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.96%
Negative yoy usage while VTLE is 48.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
183.36%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. VTLE's 1284.99%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-30.64%
Negative yoy CFO while VTLE is 100.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
23.31%
Some CapEx rise while VTLE is negative at -17.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-292.73%
Negative yoy acquisition while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
97.30%
Growth well above VTLE's 33.33%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-44.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -17.69%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to VTLE's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.