40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
269.37%
Net income growth under 50% of VTLE's 2441.66%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-0.25%
Negative yoy D&A while VTLE is 1.70%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-267.27%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VTLE stands at 1510.29%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-146.15%
Negative yoy SBC while VTLE is 38.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
62.33%
Less working capital growth vs. VTLE's 143.91%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.33%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. VTLE's 397.05%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-10.00%
Both negative yoy, with VTLE at -219.59%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
63.91%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of VTLE's 82.73%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
10.63%
CapEx growth well above VTLE's 1.96%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
262.79%
Some acquisitions while VTLE is negative at -150.43%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-103.08%
Negative yoy purchasing while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
317.65%
Liquidation growth of 317.65% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
5.77%
We have some outflow growth while VTLE is negative at -150.43%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
20.04%
Investing outflow well above VTLE's 1.24%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
50.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x VTLE's 29.63%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.