40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
146.22%
Some net income increase while VTLE is negative at -100.31%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
7.73%
D&A growth well above VTLE's 5.04%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-55.56%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
100.00%
SBC growth while VTLE is negative at -45.04%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
22.40%
Slight usage while VTLE is negative at -1397.72%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
100.00%
AR growth while VTLE is negative at -480.15%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.40%
Some yoy usage while VTLE is negative at -223.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
72.73%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. VTLE's 232.98%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
104.11%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x VTLE's 43.48%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
28.73%
Some CapEx rise while VTLE is negative at -18.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-66.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -133.52%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-28.73%
Negative yoy purchasing while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-41.54%
We reduce yoy sales while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
26.70%
We have some outflow growth while VTLE is negative at -98.69%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
19.78%
We have mild expansions while VTLE is negative at -41.53%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-57.23%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.