PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-93.01%
Negative net income growth while VTLE stands at 141.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-5.25%
Negative yoy D&A while VTLE is 24.91%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-73.27%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VTLE stands at 181.30%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-522.22%
Both cut yoy SBC, with VTLE at -0.55%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-190.97%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VTLE at -98.88%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-190.97%
Negative yoy usage while VTLE is 726.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-72.92%
Both negative yoy, with VTLE at -243.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-62.50%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VTLE at -10.49%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-43.31%
Negative yoy CapEx while VTLE is 33.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-243.86%
Negative yoy acquisition while VTLE stands at 2.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
43.31%
Purchases growth of 43.31% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
105.31%
Liquidation growth of 105.31% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-68.17%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -88.06%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-273.43%
We reduce yoy invests while VTLE stands at 32.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-8211.11%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -200.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.