PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
38.07%
Net income growth under 50% of VTLE's 81.30%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-5.43%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with VTLE at -37.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
17.62%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. VTLE's 37.99%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
275.00%
SBC growth while VTLE is negative at -41.64%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
1.72%
Slight usage while VTLE is negative at -477.16%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-53.82%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VTLE at -80.31%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.72%
Some yoy usage while VTLE is negative at -322.26%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-253.19%
Both negative yoy, with VTLE at -76.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-64.96%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VTLE at -37.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-28.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -9.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-99.34%
Negative yoy acquisition while VTLE stands at 27.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
290.96%
Purchases growth of 290.96% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-95.71%
We reduce yoy sales while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-27.76%
We reduce yoy other investing while VTLE is 100.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-217.12%
We reduce yoy invests while VTLE stands at 1.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
78.13%
Debt repayment growth of 78.13% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.