PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-58.58%
Negative net income growth while VTLE stands at 60.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-11.88%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with VTLE at -17.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-49.67%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VTLE stands at 17.60%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
314.29%
SBC growth well above VTLE's 58.23%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-259.32%
Negative yoy working capital usage while VTLE is 95.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-113.10%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VTLE at -233.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-259.32%
Negative yoy usage while VTLE is 156.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
163.89%
Some yoy increase while VTLE is negative at -38.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-47.13%
Negative yoy CFO while VTLE is 45.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
40.11%
CapEx growth well above VTLE's 13.13%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-120.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while VTLE stands at 39.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-115.60%
Negative yoy purchasing while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
1691.67%
Liquidation growth of 1691.67% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
40.11%
We have some outflow growth while VTLE is negative at -39.45%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
20.47%
Investing outflow well above VTLE's 18.41%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-93.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -378.73%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.