40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-188.64%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VTLE at -294.21%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.84%
Some yoy growth while VTLE is negative at -6.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-15.09%
Negative yoy SBC while VTLE is 0.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-53.33%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VTLE at -75.64%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-342.86%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VTLE at -177.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.33%
Negative yoy usage while VTLE is 363.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-24.19%
Negative yoy while VTLE is 61.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
6.99%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x VTLE's 3.76%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-72.20%
Negative yoy CapEx while VTLE is 48.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-99.23%
Negative yoy acquisition while VTLE stands at 32.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
1080.00%
Purchases growth of 1080.00% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
72.20%
Liquidation growth of 72.20% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-47.32%
We reduce yoy other investing while VTLE is 20113.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-129.52%
We reduce yoy invests while VTLE stands at 48.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
98.87%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 81.48%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
-84.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.