40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-23.20%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VTLE at -10.50%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.21%
Less D&A growth vs. VTLE's 11.41%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-66.67%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-230.43%
Both cut yoy SBC, with VTLE at -5.82%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
19.38%
Less working capital growth vs. VTLE's 147.14%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-52.86%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VTLE at -15.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.57%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. VTLE's 143.74%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-2600.00%
Negative yoy while VTLE is 685.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
105.66%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x VTLE's 45.99%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-4.01%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -12.40%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
286.05%
Acquisition growth of 286.05% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
4.01%
Purchases growth of 4.01% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-56.36%
We reduce yoy sales while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-4.01%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -93.40%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
19.64%
We have mild expansions while VTLE is negative at -129.09%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-50.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VTLE is 27.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.