PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
165.94%
Some net income increase while VTLE is negative at -78.82%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
13.17%
D&A growth well above VTLE's 1.09%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-98.43%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-132.14%
Negative yoy SBC while VTLE is 5.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
87.10%
Less working capital growth vs. VTLE's 1298.60%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
97.78%
AR growth well above VTLE's 112.53%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-121.43%
Negative yoy usage while VTLE is 35.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-228.57%
Negative yoy while VTLE is 111.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
3.25%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of VTLE's 29.78%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
0.20%
Some CapEx rise while VTLE is negative at -18.70%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-22.73%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -99.80%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
100.00%
Liquidation growth of 100.00% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
95.09%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. VTLE's 3420.69%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-2.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -130.63%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-4.76%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VTLE is 92.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.