PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
237.14%
Net income growth under 50% of VTLE's 1926.80%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
41.11%
D&A growth well above VTLE's 6.45%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
354.84%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. VTLE's 1923.96%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-136.96%
Both cut yoy SBC, with VTLE at -105.71%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-62.71%
Negative yoy working capital usage while VTLE is 132.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-132.76%
AR is negative yoy while VTLE is 331.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.71%
Negative yoy usage while VTLE is 13.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
51.02%
Some yoy increase while VTLE is negative at -105.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
71.27%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of VTLE's 137.30%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-1.90%
Negative yoy CapEx while VTLE is 10.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-120.27%
Negative yoy acquisition while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-155.56%
We reduce yoy other investing while VTLE is 1976.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-30.76%
We reduce yoy invests while VTLE stands at 11.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-2505.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VTLE is 56.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.25%
We cut yoy buybacks while VTLE is 98.70%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.