PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
110.84%
Net income growth under 50% of VTLE's 5651.77%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
15.43%
Some D&A expansion while VTLE is negative at -40.30%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
240.46%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. VTLE's 1528.55%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
16.67%
SBC growth while VTLE is negative at -73.14%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
163.53%
Well above VTLE's 64.89% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
133.37%
AR growth well above VTLE's 30.68%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy inventory while VTLE is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while VTLE is 123.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
119.78%
Some yoy usage while VTLE is negative at -186.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
8632.93%
Some yoy increase while VTLE is negative at -1068.78%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
44.87%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x VTLE's 9.11%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
24.89%
Some CapEx rise while VTLE is negative at -191.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
234.68%
Some acquisitions while VTLE is negative at -34.07%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-696.59%
We reduce yoy other investing while VTLE is 561.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
15.20%
We have mild expansions while VTLE is negative at -191.90%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-15084.57%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VTLE is 79.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.78%
We cut yoy buybacks while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.