40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-166.34%
Negative net income growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
0.97%
D&A growth of 0.97% while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
98.45%
Deferred tax growth of 98.45% while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-9.09%
SBC declines yoy while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
138.60%
Working capital of 138.60% while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
42.17%
AR growth of 42.17% while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-120.00%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-37.70%
AP shrinks yoy while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
338.89%
Growth of 338.89% while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
3010.00%
Growth of 3010.00% while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-9.31%
Negative CFO growth while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-9.43%
CapEx declines yoy while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
102000.00%
Acquisition growth of 102000.00% while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-350.00%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
276.95%
Investing flow of 276.95% while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-144.72%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Oil & Gas Exploration & Production median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.