40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
226.57%
Net income growth of 226.57% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
-48.89%
D&A shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
1240.68%
Deferred tax growth of 1240.68% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.30%
Working capital of 98.30% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-23.02%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
21.05%
CFO growth of 21.05% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
18.58%
CapEx growth of 18.58% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-155.78%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
168.74%
Purchases growth of 168.74% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-162.53%
We liquidate less yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-157.56%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
365.10%
Investing flow of 365.10% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
17.77%
Debt repayment growth of 17.77% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
227.31%
Issuance growth of 227.31% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
-186831.83%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.