40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-52.47%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-3.52%
D&A shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.13%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-35.39%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
102.54%
Working capital of 102.54% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
102.54%
Growth of 102.54% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-104.47%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
2.05%
CFO growth of 2.05% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
16.35%
CapEx growth of 16.35% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.21%
Growth of 152.21% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
50.84%
Investing flow of 50.84% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-62.65%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
-0.41%
We reduce issuance yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-38.03%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.