40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-22.22%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
10.34%
D&A growth of 10.34% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-173.24%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.47%
Working capital of 74.47% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.47%
Growth of 74.47% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
123.72%
Growth of 123.72% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
12.92%
CFO growth of 12.92% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-19.75%
CapEx declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.00%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-105.59%
Reduced investing yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
32.90%
Debt repayment growth of 32.90% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
95.48%
Issuance growth of 95.48% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
12.03%
Buyback growth of 12.03% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.