40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-89.54%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
1.22%
D&A growth of 1.22% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-27.27%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
393.72%
Working capital of 393.72% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.98%
Growth of 14.98% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-38.83%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
37.95%
CFO growth of 37.95% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-24.36%
CapEx declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
24525.00%
Acquisition growth of 24525.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
385.71%
Purchases growth of 385.71% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
24.36%
Proceeds growth of 24.36% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-284.94%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-194.64%
Reduced investing yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-89.47%
We reduce issuance yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.