40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1141.09%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-7.68%
D&A shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
110.71%
Deferred tax growth of 110.71% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
171.05%
SBC growth of 171.05% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-243.37%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-25.62%
AR shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-243.37%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
54.72%
Growth of 54.72% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-79.33%
Negative CFO growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
68.10%
CapEx growth under 50% of Energy median of 3.93% or substantially above. Jim Chanos would see potential overspending or misallocation if top-line is not keeping pace.
40.00%
Acquisition growth of 40.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-293.85%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
21.07%
Under 50% of Energy median of 1.37% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos sees potential overspending or major liquidity drain overshadowing typical sector levels.
56.76%
Debt repayment growth of 56.76% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.