PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-63.52%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is -2.07%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
30.00%
D&A expands slightly while Energy is negative at -1.59%. Peter Lynch might see peers pausing expansions more aggressively.
128.44%
Deferred tax growth of 128.44% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-129.41%
SBC declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
4540.00%
A slight increase while Energy median is negative at -26.31%. Peter Lynch might see peers reaping more free cash if they can do so without impacting sales.
694.58%
AR growth of 694.58% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-862.36%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-232.88%
AP shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
4540.00%
Growth of 4540.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
92.42%
A moderate rise while Energy median is negative at -6.24%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
22.06%
Positive CFO growth while Energy median is negative at -19.20%. Peter Lynch would see a notable cash advantage in a challenging sector environment.
-70.39%
CapEx declines yoy while Energy median is 3.05%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
26.38%
Acquisition growth of 26.38% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-414.29%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-46.02%
Reduced investing yoy while Energy median is 1.38%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-7000.00%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.13%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.