40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
29.44%
Positive revenue growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
29.73%
Positive gross profit growth while AR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
53.71%
Positive EBIT growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
53.71%
Positive operating income growth while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
206.43%
Positive net income growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
285.71%
Positive EPS growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
280.22%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-6.66%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-5.30%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
18.14%
Dividend growth of 18.14% while AR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
107.95%
OCF growth above 1.5x AR's 7.56%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
160.51%
FCF growth above 1.5x AR's 15.38%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
145.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AR's 226.56%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
145.26%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 76.73%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
145.26%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
579.48%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 83.73%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
579.48%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 266.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
579.48%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
487.81%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 196.15% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
487.81%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 129.17%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
487.81%
Positive short-term CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
129.02%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 24.95%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
129.02%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 2.75%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
129.02%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 31.02%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
19.22%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 12.12%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
19.22%
Dividend/share CAGR of 19.22% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
19.22%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 19.22% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
27.30%
Our AR growth while AR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-7.72%
Inventory is declining while AR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.71%
Positive asset growth while AR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
24.90%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AR's 1.35%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-20.44%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.27%
We cut SG&A while AR invests at 24.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.