PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.06%
Positive revenue growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.02%
Positive gross profit growth while AR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
32.10%
Positive EBIT growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
32.10%
Positive operating income growth while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-37.05%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-35.36%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-35.27%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-2.40%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-2.46%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.04%
Dividend reduction while AR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-28.82%
Negative OCF growth while AR is at 7.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-59.97%
Negative FCF growth while AR is at 15.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
55.68%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AR's 226.56%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
55.68%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AR's 76.73%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
168.76%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
150.35%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
393.30%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 196.15% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
393.30%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 129.17%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
640.48%
Positive short-term CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
364.68%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 24.95%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
364.68%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 2.75%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
164.04%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 31.02%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
457.61%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 457.61% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-3.37%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
39.43%
Inventory growth of 39.43% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
2.32%
Positive asset growth while AR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.82%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AR's 1.35%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
6.76%
We have some new debt while AR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.01%
We cut SG&A while AR invests at 24.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.