40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
47.06%
Positive revenue growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
89.19%
Positive gross profit growth while AR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
170.91%
Positive EBIT growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
170.91%
Positive operating income growth while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
190.99%
Positive net income growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
190.80%
Positive EPS growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
190.18%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.01%
Slight or no buybacks while AR is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.40%
Dividend reduction while AR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
53.13%
OCF growth above 1.5x AR's 7.56%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
682544.15%
FCF growth above 1.5x AR's 15.38%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
360.84%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 226.56%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
695.58%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 76.73%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
204.93%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
398.92%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AR's 266.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
190.35%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1291.45%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 196.15% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
1988.69%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 129.17%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
1423.87%
Positive short-term CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
540.74%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 24.95%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
264.08%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 2.75%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
95.42%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 31.02%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2147.44%
Dividend/share CAGR of 2147.44% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
435.77%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 435.77% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-32.27%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-9.99%
Inventory is declining while AR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.00%
Positive asset growth while AR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
13.56%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AR's 1.35%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-6.87%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.00%
We cut SG&A while AR invests at 24.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.