PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.16%
Positive revenue growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-17.99%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-56.00%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-56.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-89.54%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-90.63%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-90.63%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.03%
Slight or no buybacks while AR is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.36%
Dividend reduction while AR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
37.95%
OCF growth above 1.5x AR's 7.56%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
55.02%
FCF growth above 1.5x AR's 15.38%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
65.93%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AR's 226.56%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
94.28%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AR's 76.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
6.58%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
213.68%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of AR's 266.41%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
75.55%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-90.22%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while AR is at 196.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-92.17%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AR is 129.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-98.02%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
575.59%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 24.95%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
154.17%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 2.75%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
45.39%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AR's 31.02%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
723.35%
Dividend/share CAGR of 723.35% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
303.91%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 303.91% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
7.14%
Our AR growth while AR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
2.39%
Inventory growth of 2.39% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
9.58%
Positive asset growth while AR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.91%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AR's 1.35%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
59.39%
We have some new debt while AR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.83%
SG&A growth well above AR's 24.05%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.