PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
411.79%
Positive revenue growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
109.76%
Positive gross profit growth while AR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
390.41%
Positive EBIT growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
390.41%
Positive operating income growth while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
134.28%
Positive net income growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
135.22%
Positive EPS growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
131.68%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.53%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.26%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.88%
Dividend growth of 0.88% while AR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-155.54%
Negative OCF growth while AR is at 7.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-428.52%
Negative FCF growth while AR is at 15.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
485.87%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 226.56%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
42.39%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AR's 76.73%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-15.86%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-873.63%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while AR stands at 83.73%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-158.49%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while AR is at 266.41%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-148.48%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
1878.88%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 196.15% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
4931.70%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 129.17%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
259.43%
Positive short-term CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
661.15%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 24.95%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
91.17%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 2.75%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
26.08%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of AR's 31.02%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
926.54%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 12.12%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
394.15%
Dividend/share CAGR of 394.15% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
16.75%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 16.75% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
11.27%
Our AR growth while AR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
25.00%
Inventory growth of 25.00% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
0.33%
Positive asset growth while AR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
8.72%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AR's 1.35%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.46%
We have some new debt while AR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.43%
We cut SG&A while AR invests at 24.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.