PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.29%
Revenue growth similar to AR's 21.32%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
15.01%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AR's 397.40%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
132.99%
Positive EBIT growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
132.99%
Positive operating income growth while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
150.33%
Positive net income growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
150.21%
Positive EPS growth while AR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
149.15%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.40%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AR's 10.46%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
2.39%
Slight or no buyback while AR is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-0.40%
Dividend reduction while AR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
15.02%
OCF growth under 50% of AR's 131.86%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
26.86%
FCF growth under 50% of AR's 139.85%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-37.58%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AR stands at 2238.36%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
58.08%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AR's 229.19%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
4.57%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AR's 68.68%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-26.03%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while AR stands at 391.70%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
241.13%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 54.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
62.15%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AR's 11.02%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
124.29%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
152.80%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
52.87%
Positive short-term CAGR while AR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-86.16%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while AR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-51.37%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-54.42%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-90.76%
Cut dividends over 10 years while AR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
19.56%
Dividend/share CAGR of 19.56% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
19.52%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 19.52% while AR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
40.60%
AR growth well above AR's 17.50%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.45%
Positive asset growth while AR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
7.31%
Positive BV/share change while AR is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.78%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
318.18%
SG&A growth well above AR's 22.92%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.