PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
164.83%
Positive revenue growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
195.15%
Positive gross profit growth while CVE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
147.80%
Positive EBIT growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
147.80%
Positive operating income growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
262.73%
Positive net income growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
100.00%
Positive EPS growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
95.12%
Positive diluted EPS growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
13.18%
Slight or no buybacks while CVE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
15.39%
Slight or no buyback while CVE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
104.38%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while CVE cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
314.66%
OCF growth above 1.5x CVE's 80.53%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-165.88%
Negative FCF growth while CVE is at 1306.98%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
247.56%
Our AR growth while CVE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
570.74%
We show growth while CVE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
212.52%
Positive asset growth while CVE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
193.38%
Positive BV/share change while CVE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
250.84%
We have some new debt while CVE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
731.43%
We expand SG&A while CVE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.