PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.24%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
31.24%
Positive gross profit growth while CVE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-45.79%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-45.79%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-101.74%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-101.90%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-101.81%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-7.67%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-5.89%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
3.25%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while CVE cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
50.48%
OCF growth at 50-75% of CVE's 80.53%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
16.10%
FCF growth under 50% of CVE's 1306.98%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
311.46%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
311.46%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
311.46%
Positive 3Y CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1222.66%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while CVE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
1222.66%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x CVE's 100.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
1222.66%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-140.96%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-140.96%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while CVE is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-140.96%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
298.15%
Positive growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
298.15%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
298.15%
Positive short-term equity growth while CVE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
107.74%
Stable or rising dividend while CVE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
107.74%
Dividend/share CAGR of 107.74% while CVE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
107.74%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while CVE cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-18.05%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-59.28%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.50%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
2.73%
Positive BV/share change while CVE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.65%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
116.80%
We expand SG&A while CVE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.