PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
47.06%
Positive revenue growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
89.19%
Positive gross profit growth while CVE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
170.91%
Positive EBIT growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
170.91%
Positive operating income growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
190.99%
Positive net income growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
190.80%
Positive EPS growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
190.18%
Positive diluted EPS growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.01%
Slight or no buybacks while CVE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.40%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
53.13%
OCF growth at 50-75% of CVE's 80.53%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
682544.15%
FCF growth above 1.5x CVE's 1306.98%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
360.84%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
695.58%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
204.93%
Positive 3Y CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
398.92%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x CVE's 100.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
190.35%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1291.45%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1988.69%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x CVE's 100.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
1423.87%
Positive short-term CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
540.74%
Positive growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
264.08%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
95.42%
Positive short-term equity growth while CVE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2147.44%
Dividend/share CAGR of 2147.44% while CVE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
435.77%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while CVE cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-32.27%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-9.99%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.00%
Positive asset growth while CVE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
13.56%
Positive BV/share change while CVE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.87%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.00%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.