PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
63.91%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of CVE's 73.67%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
467.26%
Positive gross profit growth while CVE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
62.90%
Positive EBIT growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
62.90%
Positive operating income growth while CVE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
65.30%
Net income growth above 1.5x CVE's 17.45%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
65.32%
EPS growth above 1.5x CVE's 15.79%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
65.32%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x CVE's 15.79%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.00%
Dividend reduction while CVE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
321.37%
OCF growth above 1.5x CVE's 187.77%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
205.19%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x CVE's 159.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
-72.18%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-41.29%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
3.54%
Positive 3Y CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-78.91%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-29.56%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
3.45%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of CVE's 25.31%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-242.27%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
20.35%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CVE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-487.55%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-85.78%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while CVE stands at 3.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-58.07%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-53.19%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-90.75%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-59.12%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
28.42%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while CVE cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-6.53%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.75%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-25.90%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-2.85%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.70%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.