PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
29.44%
Positive revenue growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
29.73%
Positive gross profit growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
53.71%
Positive EBIT growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
53.71%
Positive operating income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
206.43%
Positive net income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
285.71%
Positive EPS growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
280.22%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-6.66%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-5.30%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
18.14%
Dividend growth above 1.5x MTDR's 0.08%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
107.95%
Positive OCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
160.51%
Positive FCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
145.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 690.14%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
145.26%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 1272.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
145.26%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
579.48%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 1566.28%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
579.48%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 362.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
579.48%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
487.81%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 163.75% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
487.81%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 139.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
487.81%
Positive short-term CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
129.02%
Below 50% of MTDR's 274.37%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
129.02%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MTDR's 204.54%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
129.02%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MTDR's 101.40%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
19.22%
Dividend/share CAGR of 19.22% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
19.22%
Dividend/share CAGR of 19.22% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
19.22%
Below 50% of MTDR's 529.33%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
27.30%
AR growth well above MTDR's 2.38%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-7.72%
Inventory is declining while MTDR stands at 23.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.71%
Asset growth well under 50% of MTDR's 1.79%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
24.90%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MTDR's 2.09%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-20.44%
We’re deleveraging while MTDR stands at 0.54%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.27%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.