PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.20%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
21.97%
Positive gross profit growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
42.63%
Positive EBIT growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
42.63%
Positive operating income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1968.89%
Positive net income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
2385.71%
Positive EPS growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
2450.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-19.18%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-18.90%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
86.34%
Dividend growth above 1.5x MTDR's 0.08%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-54.38%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-242.61%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
114.98%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 690.14%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
114.98%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 1272.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
114.98%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
103.79%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 1566.28%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
103.79%
Below 50% of MTDR's 362.73%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
103.79%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
195.52%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MTDR's 163.75%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
195.52%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MTDR's 139.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
195.52%
Positive short-term CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
67.87%
Below 50% of MTDR's 274.37%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
67.87%
Below 50% of MTDR's 204.54%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
67.87%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MTDR's 101.40%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
89.40%
Dividend/share CAGR of 89.40% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
89.40%
Dividend/share CAGR of 89.40% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
89.40%
Below 50% of MTDR's 529.33%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
37.86%
AR growth well above MTDR's 2.38%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
103.35%
Inventory growth well above MTDR's 23.07%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-3.30%
Negative asset growth while MTDR invests at 1.79%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
23.70%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MTDR's 2.09%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-8.94%
We’re deleveraging while MTDR stands at 0.54%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.18%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.