PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.51%
Positive revenue growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
4.70%
Positive gross profit growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
32.40%
Positive EBIT growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
32.40%
Positive operating income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-24.51%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-10.71%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-12.09%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-1.87%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.44%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
100.38%
Dividend growth above 1.5x MTDR's 0.08%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
12.92%
Positive OCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-6.11%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
596.28%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of MTDR's 690.14%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
596.28%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 1272.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
142.03%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1495.67%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with MTDR's 1566.28%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
1495.67%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 362.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
78.93%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
450.57%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 163.75% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
450.57%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 139.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
134.04%
Positive short-term CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
503.68%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 274.37%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
503.68%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 204.54%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
103.11%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to MTDR's 101.40%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
779.23%
Dividend/share CAGR of 779.23% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
779.23%
Dividend/share CAGR of 779.23% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
354.22%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of MTDR's 529.33%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
37.77%
AR growth well above MTDR's 2.38%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
222.03%
Inventory growth well above MTDR's 23.07%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
12.18%
Asset growth above 1.5x MTDR's 1.79%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-1.36%
We have a declining book value while MTDR shows 2.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
5.85%
Debt growth far above MTDR's 0.54%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.30%
We expand SG&A while MTDR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.