PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.30%
Positive revenue growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-17.94%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-40.26%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-40.26%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
15.45%
Positive net income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
16.59%
Positive EPS growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
16.59%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.73%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.25%
Dividend reduction while MTDR stands at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-3.02%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-507.40%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
352.51%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MTDR's 690.14%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
436.36%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 1272.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
139.13%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
469.32%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 1566.28%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
599.52%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 362.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
162.89%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1390.71%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 163.75% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
694.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 139.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-34.46%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
460.83%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 274.37%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
379.31%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 204.54%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
126.78%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MTDR's 101.40%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
961.77%
Dividend/share CAGR of 961.77% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
912.89%
Dividend/share CAGR of 912.89% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
408.06%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of MTDR's 529.33%. Bill Ackman wants overhead or revenue enhancements to match competitor's dividend growth.
-2.47%
Firm’s AR is declining while MTDR shows 2.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
6.74%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MTDR's 23.07%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
7.98%
Asset growth above 1.5x MTDR's 1.79%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.26%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MTDR's 2.09%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
31.58%
Debt growth far above MTDR's 0.54%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.26%
We expand SG&A while MTDR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.