PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.78%
Positive revenue growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
12.45%
Positive gross profit growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
12.10%
Positive EBIT growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
12.10%
Positive operating income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1213.67%
Positive net income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1258.33%
Positive EPS growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1258.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-2.45%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-2.76%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
2.63%
Dividend growth above 1.5x MTDR's 0.08%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
13.66%
Positive OCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
99.94%
Positive FCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
409.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MTDR's 690.14%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
436.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 1272.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
137.17%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
438.60%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 1566.28%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
180.64%
Below 50% of MTDR's 362.73%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
164.29%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
398.91%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 163.75% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
170.66%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MTDR's 139.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
68.83%
Positive short-term CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
199.38%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MTDR's 274.37%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
217.43%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with MTDR's 204.54%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
78.34%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of MTDR's 101.40%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
897.71%
Dividend/share CAGR of 897.71% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
1005.59%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1005.59% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
426.78%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of MTDR's 529.33%. Bill Ackman wants overhead or revenue enhancements to match competitor's dividend growth.
25.45%
AR growth well above MTDR's 2.38%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
41.01%
Inventory growth well above MTDR's 23.07%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
5.27%
Asset growth above 1.5x MTDR's 1.79%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
7.57%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MTDR's 2.09%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
2.65%
Debt growth far above MTDR's 0.54%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.31%
We expand SG&A while MTDR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.