PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
47.06%
Positive revenue growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
89.19%
Positive gross profit growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
170.91%
Positive EBIT growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
170.91%
Positive operating income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
190.99%
Positive net income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
190.80%
Positive EPS growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
190.18%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.01%
Slight or no buybacks while MTDR is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.40%
Dividend reduction while MTDR stands at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
53.13%
Positive OCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
682544.15%
Positive FCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
360.84%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MTDR's 690.14%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
695.58%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MTDR's 1272.50%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
204.93%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
398.92%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to MTDR's 362.73%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
190.35%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1291.45%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 163.75% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
1988.69%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 139.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
1423.87%
Positive short-term CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
540.74%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 274.37%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
264.08%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MTDR's 204.54%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
95.42%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to MTDR's 101.40%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2147.44%
Dividend/share CAGR of 2147.44% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
435.77%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of MTDR's 529.33%. Bill Ackman wants overhead or revenue enhancements to match competitor's dividend growth.
-32.27%
Firm’s AR is declining while MTDR shows 2.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-9.99%
Inventory is declining while MTDR stands at 23.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.00%
Asset growth at 50-75% of MTDR's 1.79%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
13.56%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MTDR's 2.09%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-6.87%
We’re deleveraging while MTDR stands at 0.54%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.00%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.