PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-18.36%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-39.33%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-66.67%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-66.67%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-75.16%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-75.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-75.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.07%
Slight or no buybacks while MTDR is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.27%
Dividend growth above 1.5x MTDR's 0.08%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
6.77%
Positive OCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
255.33%
Positive FCF growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
161.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 690.14%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
69.53%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 1272.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
9.12%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
426.71%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 1566.28%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
200.57%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MTDR's 362.73%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
-7.17%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-2.45%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MTDR is at 163.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
17.10%
Below 50% of MTDR's 139.65%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-87.77%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
248.34%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with MTDR's 274.37%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
160.40%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of MTDR's 204.54%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
48.09%
Below 50% of MTDR's 101.40%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
899.39%
Dividend/share CAGR of 899.39% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
701.10%
Dividend/share CAGR of 701.10% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
305.19%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of MTDR's 529.33%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
6.92%
AR growth well above MTDR's 2.38%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
32.46%
Inventory growth well above MTDR's 23.07%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.58%
Asset growth at 75-90% of MTDR's 1.79%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
3.69%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MTDR's 2.09%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-5.34%
We’re deleveraging while MTDR stands at 0.54%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.18%
We expand SG&A while MTDR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.