PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.49%
Revenue growth under 50% of MTDR's 133.31%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
31.21%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MTDR's 141.95%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
134.02%
Positive EBIT growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
134.02%
Positive operating income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
285.71%
Positive net income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
282.76%
Positive EPS growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
282.76%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.18%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x MTDR's 5.09%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.12%
Negative OCF growth while MTDR is at 116.44%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-291.02%
Negative FCF growth while MTDR is at 66.73%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
176.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 49.44%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-52.12%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MTDR stands at 49.44%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-72.94%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MTDR stands at 49.44%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
537.27%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 40.26%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-63.04%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR is at 40.26%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-62.37%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 40.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
4.07%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-92.90%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-12.35%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
627.17%
Equity/share CAGR of 627.17% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
36.80%
Equity/share CAGR of 36.80% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
-10.95%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MTDR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
917.44%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 0.26%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
208.07%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x MTDR's 0.26%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
-48.79%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MTDR invests at 0.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
11.12%
AR growth well above MTDR's 11.43%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-33.33%
Inventory is declining while MTDR stands at 22.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.70%
Positive asset growth while MTDR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-2.38%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
5.11%
Debt shrinking faster vs. MTDR's 60.00%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.78%
We expand SG&A while MTDR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.