PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.59%
Positive revenue growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
7.03%
Positive gross profit growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-152.91%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-152.91%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-305.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-306.17%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-306.17%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.18%
Reduced diluted shares while MTDR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.98%
Negative OCF growth while MTDR is at 83.91%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-21.43%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
94.91%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MTDR's 73.89%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
-24.34%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MTDR stands at 73.89%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-62.20%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MTDR stands at 73.89%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
198.22%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MTDR's 342.64%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
-19.41%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR is at 342.64%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-44.64%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 342.64%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-444.10%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MTDR is at 425.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-145.86%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MTDR is 425.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-123.28%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MTDR is 425.57%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
347.81%
Positive growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
14.67%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-27.59%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
956.80%
Stable or rising dividend while MTDR is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
131.87%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while MTDR is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
-50.07%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
2.03%
Our AR growth while MTDR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
100.00%
We show growth while MTDR is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-2.16%
Negative asset growth while MTDR invests at 14.67%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.54%
We have a declining book value while MTDR shows 1.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-6.57%
We’re deleveraging while MTDR stands at 32.94%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
137.21%
SG&A growth well above MTDR's 8.59%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.