PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
58.07%
Revenue growth above 1.5x MTDR's 26.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
163.75%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MTDR's 2486.16%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
206.96%
Positive EBIT growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
206.96%
Positive operating income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
23.23%
Positive net income growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.20%
Positive EPS growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.41%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MTDR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.05%
Share reduction while MTDR is at 2.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.23%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x MTDR's 2.11%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
2.75%
Dividend growth of 2.75% while MTDR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
52.01%
OCF growth under 50% of MTDR's 261.87%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
95.51%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x MTDR's 63.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
-66.84%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 390.25%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-52.62%
Negative 5Y CAGR while MTDR stands at 390.25%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
12.06%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MTDR's 69.09%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-61.62%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 382.02%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-70.06%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR is at 382.02%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-65.27%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 64.48%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-573.05%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-278.61%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
13.02%
Positive short-term CAGR while MTDR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-50.44%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while MTDR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-66.09%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while MTDR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
6.58%
Below 50% of MTDR's 17.08%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-39.24%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-77.36%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-77.37%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MTDR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-6.13%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-69.64%
Inventory is declining while MTDR stands at 4.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-9.18%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-14.01%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-1.51%
We’re deleveraging while MTDR stands at 0.07%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.04%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.