PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-72.53%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-106.81%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-634.78%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-634.78%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-1141.09%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-1141.36%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-1141.36%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.17%
Dividend growth of 4.17% while MTDR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-79.33%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
39.73%
FCF growth above 1.5x MTDR's 20.36%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-71.94%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 207.57%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-43.36%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-49.79%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-92.56%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 51.14%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-74.58%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR is at 260.10%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-59.80%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 45.51%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-392.82%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-76.29%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-1091.85%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-80.13%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while MTDR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-51.35%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while MTDR is at 22.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-35.15%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MTDR is at 59.51%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-90.34%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-56.24%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MTDR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
33.76%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 33.76% while MTDR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-9.41%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.90%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-42.37%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
4.38%
Debt growth far above MTDR's 4.99%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.71%
We expand SG&A while MTDR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.